Kelly Michels c276596f35 test(coverage): run the Pester suite with code coverage (#47) ... tests/Invoke-Coverage.ps1 runs the suite with Pester's profiler-based coverage collector and writes both JaCoCo XML and a coverage-summary.json in the same shape vitest and jest emit, so one reader handles every tool in the fleet. CodeCoverage.Path is every *.ps1 in the repo root, including the ones no test touches. They report 0% and drag the total down, which is correct - measuring only the already-tested files answers "how well covered is the covered code". The same mistake in vitest form had evo.www reporting 93%. Baseline: 222 tests pass, 7.0% of commands (219/3,125 across 24 scripts). Pester counts commands, not statements; the collector labels it as such rather than filing it under a unit it is not.		2026-08-13 16:26:19 -05:00
..
fixtures	test: add Pester suite for ZHelpers pure logic + ZCONFIG seam (phases 1-2) (#27)	2026-07-26 12:20:32 -05:00
ArgumentParsing.Tests.ps1	chore: point repo URLs at evomedia-net/evo.* (#44)	2026-08-09 11:31:43 -05:00
Checksums.Tests.ps1	chore: point repo URLs at evomedia-net/evo.* (#44)	2026-08-09 11:31:43 -05:00
Invoke-Coverage.ps1	test(coverage): run the Pester suite with code coverage (#47)	2026-08-13 16:26:19 -05:00
NewProjectArchive.Tests.ps1	chore: point repo URLs at evomedia-net/evo.* (#44)	2026-08-09 11:31:43 -05:00
ZHelpers.Tests.ps1	chore: point repo URLs at evomedia-net/evo.* (#44)	2026-08-09 11:31:43 -05:00