tests/Invoke-Coverage.ps1 runs the suite with Pester's profiler-based
coverage collector and writes both JaCoCo XML and a coverage-summary.json
in the same shape vitest and jest emit, so one reader handles every tool
in the fleet.
CodeCoverage.Path is every *.ps1 in the repo root, including the ones no
test touches. They report 0% and drag the total down, which is correct -
measuring only the already-tested files answers "how well covered is the
covered code". The same mistake in vitest form had evo.www reporting 93%.
Baseline: 222 tests pass, 7.0% of commands (219/3,125 across 24 scripts).
Pester counts commands, not statements; the collector labels it as such
rather than filing it under a unit it is not.
- One headline number everywhere: ~26,500 measured tokens/day (README said 3,000-7,000; ELEVATOR_PITCH said 157,000-540,000)
- Measurement note: measured output volume, estimated tokenization; /3.5 is conservative for code-heavy output
- Raw-orchestration column explicitly labeled an upper bound, not a prediction
- Measured dollar column priced at input rates (blended kept for est-raw only); note on re-sent context tokens
- Untrack md/Z-ScriptTokenData.md (superseded internal notes; md/ gitignored)
Config-driven PowerShell scripts to run infrastructure tasks (deploy, restart, backup, diagnostics) yourself instead of having an AI agent orchestrate them, to save agent tokens. Environment specifics live in zconfig.json (gitignored).
